New, Revised and Small Sites
Search representations
Results for Bressingham and Fersfield Parish Council search
New searchObject
New, Revised and Small Sites
GNLP2052
Representation ID: 18085
Received: 08/12/2018
Respondent: Bressingham and Fersfield Parish Council
GNLP 2052
We understand that this site is actually to the west of The Street. We fully endorse your 5.11 Statement recognising the site as unsuitable.
GNLP 2052
We understand that this site is actually to the west of The Street. We fully endorse your 5.11 Statement recognising the site as unsuitable.
Object
New, Revised and Small Sites
GNLP2053
Representation ID: 18086
Received: 08/12/2018
Respondent: Bressingham and Fersfield Parish Council
We endorse your view that this site is unsuitable for allocation.
We endorse your view that this site is unsuitable for allocation.
Object
New, Revised and Small Sites
GNLP2054
Representation ID: 18087
Received: 08/12/2018
Respondent: Bressingham and Fersfield Parish Council
This site adjoins a water course which runs parallel to School Road. The latter is frequently flooded and in a poor state of repair owing to water damage. School Road is of a narrow single track standard, serves as the main access to Bressingham Village and contains our primary school and is therefore a constant concern regarding parking. At its southern end where it opens onto the busy A1066 the junction is a poor one with restricted vision.
This site adjoins a water course which runs parallel to School Road. The latter is frequently flooded and in a poor state of repair owing to water damage. School Road is of a narrow single track standard, serves as the main access to Bressingham Village and contains our primary school and is therefore a constant concern regarding parking. At its southern end where it opens onto the busy A1066 the junction is a poor one with restricted vision.
Object
New, Revised and Small Sites
GNLP2056
Representation ID: 18088
Received: 08/12/2018
Respondent: Bressingham and Fersfield Parish Council
We endorse your view of its unsuitability.
We endorse your view of its unsuitability.
Object
New, Revised and Small Sites
GNLP2057
Representation ID: 18089
Received: 08/12/2018
Respondent: Bressingham and Fersfield Parish Council
Concerns about access from the A1066 and possible flooding issues.
Concerns about access from the A1066 and possible flooding issues.
Object
New, Revised and Small Sites
GNLP2079
Representation ID: 18090
Received: 08/12/2018
Respondent: Bressingham and Fersfield Parish Council
There may be some long term validity in this site but the current Joint Core Strategy would need to redesignate Bressingham as a service village. Consequently considerable strategic planning will be required.
There may be some long term validity in this site but the current Joint Core Strategy would need to redesignate Bressingham as a service village. Consequently considerable strategic planning will be required.
Object
New, Revised and Small Sites
GNLP2079
Representation ID: 18091
Received: 08/12/2018
Respondent: Bressingham and Fersfield Parish Council
This development runs contrary to Bressingham's "Other Village" category and seems to owe more to opportunism than carefully planned development. It would change the character and setting of this part of the village and alter the aspect of the much respected and cherished War Memorial for which the parish council has responsibility.
This development runs contrary to Bressingham's "Other Village" category and seems to owe more to opportunism than carefully planned development. It would change the character and setting of this part of the village and alter the aspect of the much respected and cherished War Memorial for which the parish council has responsibility.
Object
New, Revised and Small Sites
GNLP2113
Representation ID: 18843
Received: 13/12/2018
Respondent: Bressingham and Fersfield Parish Council
This site shares the dominant constraint common to all Bressingham/Fersfield sites: an absence of essential infrastructure, services and transport. which render it completely unsuitable for a project of this dimension. Its development would also impact adversely on this part of the village, particularly in relation to safety and use of the nearby roads, for example, High Road, which could not cope with additional traffic flow. The policy of serial addition of small areas at village peripheries would be corrupted should a re-classification of Bressingham as a 'Service Village' within Joint Core Strategy terms be necessarily attempted.
This site shares the dominant constraint common to all Bressingham/Fersfield sites: an absence of essential infrastructure, services and transport. which render it completely unsuitable for a project of this dimension. Its development would also impact adversely on this part of the village, particularly in relation to safety and use of the nearby roads, for example, High Road, which could not cope with additional traffic flow. The policy of serial addition of small areas at village peripheries would be corrupted should a re-classification of Bressingham as a 'Service Village' within Joint Core Strategy terms be necessarily attempted.
