Publication
Search representations
Results for Buxton with Lamas Parish Council search
New searchObject
Publication
0596R Policy
Representation ID: 24145
Received: 21/03/2021
Respondent: Buxton with Lamas Parish Council
Legally compliant? No
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
The PC (Buxton with Lamas) does not believe that the second additional site for Aylsham should have been added within regulation 19 without full consultation and that if they were to get permission the infrastructure would not cope. Schools are full, doctors' surgeries are full, the parking is totally inadequate . The impact of infrastructure of an additional site could not have been examined or considered by the officers , Broadland district council as the second site was not included for housing allocation in reg 18 consultation, so could not be consulted on and therefore is not sound or legally compliant.
That phasing of two sites to aid any identified infrastructure problems which may have been identified via consultation could not be considered as the second site was not consulted on in reg 18, therefore, is not legally sound or properly prepared.
Section 33A of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004 [F133 Duty to co-operate ] requires Broadland to engage constructively, actively and on an ongoing basis with neighbouring authorities and certain other bodies over strategic matters during the preparation of the plan. Buxton with Lamas parish council were not consulted on with regard to the second site as this was not put forward in reg 18 and therefore is not sound or legally compliant or properly prepared.
What does the parish council consider should be altered as a result of reg 19 consultation? That the addition of a second site should be removed, as this was not consulted and any possible infrastructure issues identified or examined or considered there for is not legally sound or properly prepared. If the second site is not removed at this stage, then to ensure that this is legally sound and properly prepared then this should be consulted on as per reg 18 stage again to make legally sound, compliant and properly prepared, which may mean the second site is removed or phasing takes place once infrastructure has been examined and considered or it is demonstrated that the infrastructure can support, then proceed to reg 19 to ensure legally sound, compliant and properly prepared.
The PC (Buxton with Lamas) does not believe that the second additional site for Aylsham should have been added within regulation 19 without full consultation and that if they were to get permission the infrastructure would not cope. Schools are full, doctors' surgeries are full, the parking is totally inadequate . The impact of infrastructure of an additional site could not have been examined or considered by the officers , Broadland district council as the second site was not included for housing allocation in reg 18 consultation, so could not be consulted on and therefore is not sound or legally compliant.
That phasing of two sites to aid any identified infrastructure problems which may have been identified via consultation could not be considered as the second site was not consulted on in reg 18, therefore, is not legally sound or properly prepared.
Section 33A of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004 [F133 Duty to co-operate ] requires Broadland to engage constructively, actively and on an ongoing basis with neighbouring authorities and certain other bodies over strategic matters during the preparation of the plan. Buxton with Lamas parish council were not consulted on with regard to the second site as this was not put forward in reg 18 and therefore is not sound or legally compliant or properly prepared.
