Publication

Soundness
Clear evidence of the need for the increase in number of dwellings over and above those approved in the Cringleford Neighbourhood Development Plan. Provision of this 'evidence of need' should aim at a dialogue between the authors of the GNLP and Cringleford Parish Council to establish a more appropriate level of development that fits with the local environment.

Duty of Co-operation
There is no reasoning provided for the uplift in the number of houses allocated to our parish in the GNLP. Evidence that local concerns have been discussed collaboratively, listened to, and acted upon is required. Our Neighbourhood Plan accepts the need for development and was the result of consultation with our parishioners. A parish council is the conduit for the voice of local people to be heard at county and national level. A clear audit trail with evidence is required to demonstrate co-operation has occurred, potentially resulting in amendments being made to the housing requirements in Cringleford within the GNLP (or any plan for housing development).

Cringleford Parish Council: Response to Greater Norwich Local Plan Summary
• Cringleford Parish Council challenges the GNLP’s Regulation 19 proposals for the Parish of Cringleford on the grounds of Soundness and Lack of Compliance with the Duty to Cooperate.
• The GNLP has not taken into consideration biodiversity or the changing economic environment when considering its proposals for our Parish.
• The GNLP has ignored Government, Local and its own most recent documents in formulating its proposals.
• There are no net gains in the proposals for Cringleford.
• The GNLP has ignored comments of the Parish made under Regulation 18 and is proposing a 32% increase over planned residential dwellings without providing evidence of need for the additional housing in Cringleford.

See attachment for full submission.

Soundness
Clear evidence of the need for the increase in number of dwellings over and above those approved in the Cringleford Neighbourhood Development Plan. Provision of this 'evidence of need' should aim at a dialogue between the authors of the GNLP and Cringleford Parish Council to establish a more appropriate level of development that fits with the local environment.

Duty of Co-operation
There is no reasoning provided for the uplift in the number of houses allocated to our parish in the GNLP. Evidence that local concerns have been discussed collaboratively, listened to, and acted upon is required. Our Neighbourhood Plan accepts the need for development and was the result of consultation with our parishioners. A parish council is the conduit for the voice of local people to be heard at county and national level. A clear audit trail with evidence is required to demonstrate co-operation has occurred, potentially resulting in amendments being made to the housing requirements in Cringleford within the GNLP (or any plan for housing development).

Cringleford Parish Council: Response to Greater Norwich Local Plan Summary
• Cringleford Parish Council challenges the GNLP’s Regulation 19 proposals for the Parish of Cringleford on the grounds of Soundness and Lack of Compliance with the Duty to Cooperate.
• The GNLP has not taken into consideration biodiversity or the changing economic environment when considering its proposals for our Parish.
• The GNLP has ignored Government, Local and its own most recent documents in formulating its proposals.
• There are no net gains in the proposals for Cringleford.
• The GNLP has ignored comments of the Parish made under Regulation 18 and is proposing a 32% increase over planned residential dwellings without providing evidence of need for the additional housing in Cringleford.

See attachment for full submission.

Soundness
Clear evidence of the need for the increase in number of dwellings over and above those approved in the Cringleford Neighbourhood Development Plan. Provision of this 'evidence of need' should aim at a dialogue between the authors of the GNLP and Cringleford Parish Council to establish a more appropriate level of development that fits with the local environment.

Duty of Co-operation
There is no reasoning provided for the uplift in the number of houses allocated to our parish in the GNLP. Evidence that local concerns have been discussed collaboratively, listened to, and acted upon is required. Our Neighbourhood Plan accepts the need for development and was the result of consultation with our parishioners. A parish council is the conduit for the voice of local people to be heard at county and national level. A clear audit trail with evidence is required to demonstrate co-operation has occurred, potentially resulting in amendments being made to the housing requirements in Cringleford within the GNLP (or any plan for housing development).

Cringleford Parish Council: Response to Greater Norwich Local Plan Summary
• Cringleford Parish Council challenges the GNLP’s Regulation 19 proposals for the Parish of Cringleford on the grounds of Soundness and Lack of Compliance with the Duty to Cooperate.
• The GNLP has not taken into consideration biodiversity or the changing economic environment when considering its proposals for our Parish.
• The GNLP has ignored Government, Local and its own most recent documents in formulating its proposals.
• There are no net gains in the proposals for Cringleford.
• The GNLP has ignored comments of the Parish made under Regulation 18 and is proposing a 32% increase over planned residential dwellings without providing evidence of need for the additional housing in Cringleford.

See attachment for full submission.

Soundness
Clear evidence of the need for the increase in number of dwellings over and above those approved in the Cringleford Neighbourhood Development Plan. Provision of this 'evidence of need' should aim at a dialogue between the authors of the GNLP and Cringleford Parish Council to establish a more appropriate level of development that fits with the local environment.

Duty of Co-operation
There is no reasoning provided for the uplift in the number of houses allocated to our parish in the GNLP. Evidence that local concerns have been discussed collaboratively, listened to, and acted upon is required. Our Neighbourhood Plan accepts the need for development and was the result of consultation with our parishioners. A parish council is the conduit for the voice of local people to be heard at county and national level. A clear audit trail with evidence is required to demonstrate co-operation has occurred, potentially resulting in amendments being made to the housing requirements in Cringleford within the GNLP (or any plan for housing development).

Cringleford Parish Council: Response to Greater Norwich Local Plan Summary
• Cringleford Parish Council challenges the GNLP’s Regulation 19 proposals for the Parish of Cringleford on the grounds of Soundness and Lack of Compliance with the Duty to Cooperate.
• The GNLP has not taken into consideration biodiversity or the changing economic environment when considering its proposals for our Parish.
• The GNLP has ignored Government, Local and its own most recent documents in formulating its proposals.
• There are no net gains in the proposals for Cringleford.
• The GNLP has ignored comments of the Parish made under Regulation 18 and is proposing a 32% increase over planned residential dwellings without providing evidence of need for the additional housing in Cringleford.

See attachment for full submission.

Soundness
Clear evidence of the need for the increase in number of dwellings over and above those approved in the Cringleford Neighbourhood Development Plan. Provision of this 'evidence of need' should aim at a dialogue between the authors of the GNLP and Cringleford Parish Council to establish a more appropriate level of development that fits with the local environment.

Duty of Co-operation
There is no reasoning provided for the uplift in the number of houses allocated to our parish in the GNLP. Evidence that local concerns have been discussed collaboratively, listened to, and acted upon is required. Our Neighbourhood Plan accepts the need for development and was the result of consultation with our parishioners. A parish council is the conduit for the voice of local people to be heard at county and national level. A clear audit trail with evidence is required to demonstrate co-operation has occurred, potentially resulting in amendments being made to the housing requirements in Cringleford within the GNLP (or any plan for housing development).

Cringleford Parish Council: Response to Greater Norwich Local Plan Summary
• Cringleford Parish Council challenges the GNLP’s Regulation 19 proposals for the Parish of Cringleford on the grounds of Soundness and Lack of Compliance with the Duty to Cooperate.
• The GNLP has not taken into consideration biodiversity or the changing economic environment when considering its proposals for our Parish.
• The GNLP has ignored Government, Local and its own most recent documents in formulating its proposals.
• There are no net gains in the proposals for Cringleford.
• The GNLP has ignored comments of the Parish made under Regulation 18 and is proposing a 32% increase over planned residential dwellings without providing evidence of need for the additional housing in Cringleford.

See attachment for full submission.