Publication
Search representations
Results for Foulsham Parish Council search
New searchObject
Publication
6.38
Representation ID: 23538
Received: 14/03/2021
Respondent: Foulsham Parish Council
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Yes
The Parish Council objects to this proposal. It will increase traffic through Aubrey Rix Close, which has pavement and road on the same level, with no kerbstones and is also narrow. This will bring pedestrians into close proximity with traffic, which poses a safety risk, especially as there are a large number of young children who walk to and from school along this route. The village has no bus service and therefore cars will be essential for all new residents. There are a number of other development proposals for the village which do not pose such a safety risk.
The Parish Council does not agree that the proposed access to this site is suitable and, for this reason, the site is not suitable for the proposed development. A much more suitable site exists within the village for a similar size of development.
The Parish Council objects to the proposal to develop the land outlined in GNLP0605. The proposal will increase traffic through Aubrey Rix Close, on which the pavement and road are the same level, with no kerbstones and is also a narrow road. This will bring pedestrians into close proximity with traffic, which poses a safety risk, especially as there are a large number of young children who walk to and from school along this route. The village has no bus service and therefore cars will be essential for all new residents. There are a number of other development proposals for the village which would not pose such a safety risk.
Object
Publication
Settlement Map
Representation ID: 23719
Received: 20/03/2021
Respondent: Foulsham Parish Council
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
The Parish Council has learned that site GNLP0605 contains ancient hedgerows which would require removal to gain access and is concerned that this issue has not been adequately addressed in previous consultation stages. GNLP0605 was considered a preferred site, partly on the basis that site GNLP0275 was unsuitable due to flood risk. However, permission to develop GNLP0275 has recently been granted with a similar allocation which should negate the requirement to develop GNLP0605. It is also noted that the proposed site is outside of the settlement boundary. For these reasons, the Parish Council believes the consultation process to be flawed.
The Parish Council does not believe that this site is suitable for development for the reasons outlined.
The Parish Council has learned that site GNLP0605 contains ancient hedgerows which would require removal to gain access and is concerned that this issue has not been adequately addressed in previous consultation stages. GNLP0605 was considered a preferred site, partly on the basis that site GNLP0275 was unsuitable due to flood risk. However, permission to develop GNLP0275 has recently been granted with a similar allocation which should negate the requirement to develop GNLP0605. It is also noted that the proposed site is outside of the settlement boundary. For these reasons, the Parish Council believes the consultation process to be flawed.
Object
Publication
0605 Policy
Representation ID: 23720
Received: 20/03/2021
Respondent: Foulsham Parish Council
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
The Parish Council has learned that site GNLP0605 contains ancient hedgerows which would require removal to gain access and is concerned that this issue has not been adequately addressed in previous consultation stages. GNLP0605 was considered to be a preferred site, partly on the basis that GNLP0275 was unsuitable due to flood risk. However, permission to develop GNLP0275 has recently been granted with a similar allocation which should negate the requirement to develop GNLP0605. It is also noted that the proposed site is outside the settlement boundary. For these reasons, the Parish Council believes the consultation process to be flawed.
The Parish Council believes that GNLP0605 is unsuitable for development for the reasons outlined.
The Parish Council has learned that site GNLP0605 contains ancient hedgerows which would need to be removed to gain access and is concerned that this issue has not been adequately addressed in previous stages of consultation. GNLP0605 was considered to be a preferred site, partly on the basis that site GNLP0275 was unsuitable due to flood risk. However, permission to develop GNLP0275 has recently been granted with a similar allocation which should negate the requirement to develop GNLP0605. It is also noted that the proposed site is outside of the settlement boundary. For these reasons, the Parish Council believes the consultation process to be flawed.
Object
Publication
0605 Map
Representation ID: 23819
Received: 22/03/2021
Respondent: Foulsham Parish Council
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
The Parish Council understands that to access site GNLP0605 as proposed would require the removal of ancient hedgerows and is concerned that this issue has not been adequately addressed within the consultation process. It is also noted that the proposed site is outside of the settlement boundary. In addition, the Parish Council does not agree that Aubrey Rix Close offers safe or suitable access to the site. For these reasons, the Parish Council believes the consultation process to be flawed.
The plan needs to properly appraise the points made above.
The Parish Council understands that to access site GNLP0605 as proposed would require the removal of ancient hedgerows and is concerned that this issue has not been adequately addressed within the consultation process. It is also noted that the proposed site is outside of the settlement boundary. In addition, the Parish Council does not agree that Aubrey Rix Close offers safe or suitable access to the site. For these reasons, the Parish Council believes the consultation process to be flawed.
Object
Publication
6.36
Representation ID: 23820
Received: 22/03/2021
Respondent: Foulsham Parish Council
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
The Parish Council understands that GNLP0605 was considered a preferred site, partly on the basis that site GNLP0275 was unsuitable due to being a flood risk. However, permission to develop GNLP0275 has recently been granted with a similar allocation which should negate the requirement to develop GNLP0605. The plan needs to be revised following approval to build on GNLP0275. It is also noted that the proposed site is outside of the settlement boundary. For these reasons, the Parish Council believes the consultation process to be flawed.
The plan needs to be revised following approval to build on GNLP0275.
The Parish Council understands that GNLP0605 was considered a preferred site, partly on the basis that site GNLP0275 was unsuitable due to being a flood risk. However, permission to develop GNLP0275 has recently been granted with a similar allocation which should negate the requirement to develop GNLP0605. The plan needs to be revised following approval to build on GNLP0275. It is also noted that the proposed site is outside of the settlement boundary. For these reasons, the Parish Council believes the consultation process to be flawed.
