Publication
Search representations
Results for Taylor Wimpey search
New searchSupport
Publication
0581 2043 Policy
Representation ID: 23846
Received: 22/03/2021
Respondent: Taylor Wimpey
Whilst we do not object to the contingency site in principle, we feel the trigger point is onerous to the extent that the site will not become a formal allocation until undersupply has reached a very high level. In our view greater flexibility should be built into the policy to allow for a more proactive approach in addressing a shortfall. Allocating smaller schemes which are immediately available and deliverable in order to meet under supply, such as Land south of Townhouse Road. See red line plan attached.
Whilst we do not object to the contingency site in principle, we feel the trigger point is onerous to the extent that the site will not become a formal allocation until undersupply has reached a very high level. In our view greater flexibility should be built into the policy to allow for a more proactive approach in addressing a shortfall. Allocating smaller schemes which are immediately available and deliverable in order to meet under supply, such as Land south of Townhouse Road. See red line plan attached.
